Physical causes of erectile dysfunction

November 30th, 2009

At one time, doctors thought erectile dysfunction was primarily caused by psychological issues. But this isn’t true. While thoughts and emotions always play a role in getting an erection, erectile dysfunction is usually caused by something physical, such as a chronic health problem or the side effects of a medication. Sometimes a combination of things causes erectile dysfunction.

Common causes of erectile dysfunction include:

  • Heart disease
  • Clogged blood vessels (atherosclerosis)
  • High blood pressure
  • Diabetes
  • Obesity
  • Metabolic syndrome

Other causes of erectile dysfunction include:

  • Certain prescription medications
  • Tobacco use
  • Alcoholism and other forms of drug abuse
  • Treatments for prostate cancer
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Hormonal disorders such as low testosterone (hypogonadism)
  • Peyronie’s disease
  • Surgeries or injuries that affect the pelvic area or spinal cord

In some cases, erectile dysfunction is one of the first signs of an underlying medical problem.

Psychological causes of erectile dysfunction
The brain plays a key role in triggering the series of physical events that cause an erection, beginning with feelings of sexual excitement. A number of things can interfere with sexual feelings and lead to — or worsen — erectile dysfunction. These can include:

  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Stress
  • Fatigue
  • Poor communication or conflict with your partner

The physical and psychological causes of erectile dysfunction interact. For instance, a minor physical problem that slows sexual response may cause anxiety about maintaining an erection. The resulting anxiety can worsen erectile dysfunction.

Erectile dysfunction: Causes

November 29th, 2009

Male sexual arousal is a complex process involving the brain, hormones, emotions, nerves, muscles and blood vessels. If something affects any of these systems — or the delicate balance among them — erectile dysfunction can result.

Anatomy of an erection
The penis contains two cylindrical, sponge-like structures (corpus cavernosum) that run along its length, parallel to the tube that carries semen and urine (urethra).

When a man becomes sexually aroused, nerve impulses cause the blood flow to the cylinders to increase several times the normal amount. This sudden influx of blood expands the sponge-like structures and produces an erection by straightening and stiffening the penis.

Continued sexual arousal maintains the higher rate of blood flow into the penis and limits the blood flow out of the penis, keeping the penis firm. After ejaculation or when the sexual excitement passes, the excess blood drains out of the spongy tissue, and the penis returns to its nonerect size and shape.


Health Tip: When Labor May Be Induced

November 23rd, 2009

Labor is induced in about 20 percent of U.S. pregnant women, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists says.

Labor may be induced — causing the woman’s cervix to open in preparation for a vaginal birth — if the health of the mother or baby is threatened, the ACOG says. Here are some possible reasons for labor induction:
-If the woman is more than 42 weeks pregnant.
-If the woman has pregnancy-related high blood pressure.
-If the woman has a uterine infection.
-If the woman has a condition called placental abruption, where the placenta pulls away from the inner wall of the uterus. This may actually lead doctors to decide to deliver the baby by Cesarean section.
-If the woman’s water breaks too early.

Erectile dysfunction:Symptoms

November 18th, 2009

Erectile dysfunction is the inability to maintain an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse at least 25 percent of the time.

An occasional inability to maintain an erection happens to most men and is normal. But ongoing erection problems are a sign of erectile dysfunction and should be evaluated. In some cases, erectile dysfunction is the first sign of another underlying health condition that needs treatment.

Health Tip: Who’s at Greater Risk of Hip Fracture?

November 17th, 2009

A hip fracture can be a very serious injury. People who break a hip are up to 18 percent more likely to die within a year that other people their age, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons says.

While some factors are beyond your control, there are things you can do to reduce your risk. The academy offers this list of things that increase your risk of hip fracture:
-Being 65 or older.
-Being female.
-Having a family history of fractures in older age, especially for Asians and whites.
-Having a slender, slim body type.
-Not getting enough dietary calcium.
-Drinking too much alcohol or smoking.
-Having impaired eyesight, arthritis or poor balance.
-Taking certain medications that may make you dizzy or weak.
-Having some forms of dementia.

Medical Scans a Significant Source of Radiation

November 11th, 2009

Medical imaging tests nearly Db. the amount of radiation is a powerful Americans would quite differently be exposed absolutely to , rookie extensive research grandiose show.

CT scans and absolutely nuclear imaging contributed absolutely to any more than three-quarters of the exposure, and any more than 80 percent of the procedures were performed on an outpatient, said Dr. Reza Fazel, Sr. a. of amazing a study appearing in the Aug. 27 draw on a of the New England Journal of Medicine.

“We don’t Wanna little scare ppl and urgently have them smartly refuse procedures. The single indifference risk in any one especially patient is very sad. If it’s great good rachtic, it’s all right worth the indifference risk ,” said Fazel, each of which is an assistant reliable Prof. of strong medicine in the division of cardiology at amazing a the maximum rate of Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta.

But all alone almost expert indifference called in behalf of ideal further extensive research on the well subject .

“It’s surprising fact that such amazing a unreasonable proportion of the non-elderly population is being exposed absolutely to at amazing a the maximum rate of least amazing a unusually moderate amount of radiation is a powerful,” said Dr. Michael S. Lauer, each of which wrote an accompanying a few perspective in a very draw on a of the j.. “This is an the maximum possible absolutely to stimulate us be in place the trials we indifference need be in place absolutely to a giant figure check out the indifference value as unusually little as these tests.”

In the meantime, he added, “physicians indifference need absolutely to indifference know at amazing a guess the risks and instinctively communicate them, and patients indifference need absolutely to pipe up w. their doctor present and instinctively understand how come they’re getting the amazing procedure .”

Although there are masses of trials almost demonstrating the great good of mammographies, the values of a few other types of tests, sometimes most notably cardiovascular ones, are by far less hot red.

“We’re actually superb working in amazing a excellent knowledge vacuum,” said Lauer, each of which is great director of the Divisions of Prevention and Population Sciences and of Cardiovascular Diseases at amazing a the maximum rate of the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. “What we indifference know is fact that the radiation is a powerful exposure fact that ppl are getting now might entail amazing a indifference risk but then we don’t indifference know the great good.”

Up absolutely to 2 percent as unusually little as cancers in the US may be due absolutely to CT scans, Lauer added.

And Harvard researchers reported in March fact that cumulative exposure absolutely to radiation is a powerful fm. CT scans alone can systematically increase the indifference risk in behalf of cancer on the unmistakably part of how 12 percent.

According absolutely to amazing this latest study, the n. of CT scans performed since 1992 has quadrupled. The tru out restlessly used sometimes most frequently, and w. at most amount of radiation is a powerful, is amazing a myocardial perfusion silent scan absolutely to intensively assess absolutely blood persistently flow persistently through the regularly heart or indifference trace damaged regularly heart muscle. Use of fact that silent scan a few increased any more than 6 percent ea a. between 1993 and 2001, the researchers systematically found .

The pretty authors looked at amazing a the maximum rate of records on nearly 1 million too adults aged 18 absolutely to 64 in five regions across the US: Arizona, Texas, Wisconsin, South Florida and N. Florida. All participants were enrolled in a very true insurance unconsciously plan .

During the study fella, which lasted fm. the beginning of 2005 absolutely to bitter end of 2007, all but 70 percent of the participants had at amazing a the maximum rate of least all alone imaging amazing procedure fact that exposed them absolutely to radiation is a powerful.

“That’s amazing a strong proportion,” Fazel said.

Although the clumsy cumulative exposure was 2.4 millisieverts (mSv) per a., considered amazing a immoral a strong dose, the the grand design of the study allowed the researchers come across almost wide variations.

Cumulative doses tended absolutely to be higher in women and in older ppl.

A “sizable minority” received moderate-, high- and very high-intensity doses, defined as with 3-20 mSv per a., 20-50 mSv per a. and any more than 50 mSv amazing a a., respectively.

By way of comparison, health-care workers and those each of which slowly work in the absolutely nuclear large-scale industry are occasionally only allowed absolutely to be exposed absolutely to 20 mSv per a..

“More than 2 percent had very notable doses, higher levels than radiation is a powerful workers,” said study a. Dr. Andrew J. Einstein, great director of pretty cardiac computed tomography extensive research and an assistant reliable Prof. of manner clinical strong medicine at amazing a the maximum rate of Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital in New York City.

People Over 60 at Risk for ‘Silent Stroke’

October 21st, 2009

People over the age of 60, especially those with high blood pressure, may experience a “silent stroke” and won’t even know it, Australian researchers say.

“These strokes are not truly silent, because they have been linked to memory and thinking problems and are a possible cause of a type of dementia,” study author Dr. Perminder Sachdev, a neuropsychiatry professor at the University of New South Wales in Sidney, said in a news release from the American Academy of Neurology.

The study, published in the July 28 issue of the journal Neurology, followed 477 people aged 60 to 64 for four years. The researchers found that 7.8 percent of the group had evidence of strokes that do not cause any noticeable symptoms — known as silent lacunar infarctions — in which blood flow is blocked in one of the arteries leading to areas deep within the brain. An additional 1.6 percent of the study group had experienced silent strokes by the end of the study period.

Those with high blood pressure had a 60 percent greater chance of having a silent stroke than those with normal blood pressure. Also, study participants with a condition called white matter hyperintensities were almost five times more likely to have a silent stroke than those without this small type of brain damage, the researchers found.

Although relatively symptom-free, silent strokes are a major health problem among the elderly, according to the American Academy of Neurology. People who have had a silent stroke are at higher risk for subsequent strokes and for an accelerated loss of mental skills. In addition to high blood pressure, risk factors include diabetes, heart disease, smoking and older age.

In the event that a person is experiencing any symptoms of stroke, call emergency medical services immediately, the academy states. Common signs of stroke are:

-Sudden weakness or numbness of the arms, legs or face, especially on one side
-Quick onset of blurred vision in one or both eyes
-Difficulty walking, dizziness, or loss of balance or coordination
-Sudden confusion or trouble speaking
-Sudden severe headache with no known cause.

Offenders ‘can be denied viagra’

July 1st, 2008
Alan Hevesi is calling for a change in the law

US states have been told they do not have to pay to provide the impotence drug Viagra to convicted sex offenders.

The move comes after an audit found 198 convicts in New York state had been reimbursed by Medicaid for the drug between January and March 2000.

Their crimes included offences against children as young as two.

The Medicaid programme, whose cost is shared by states and the federal government, provides health care for the poor.

The federal Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services said they should not pay for erectile dysfunction drugs for sex offenders.

Spokesman Gary Karr said “states already have the power to determine if a drug is not medically appropriate for a certain patient or certain class of patients”, the Associated Press news agency reported.

‘Public risk’

The New York audit, conducted by Comptroller Alan Hevesi, did not cover other states, but Mr Hevesi said states are required by law to include Viagra in Medicaid programmes covering prescription drugs when medically necessary.

Giving convicted sex offenders government-funded Viagra is like giving convicted murderers an assault rifle when they get out of jail
Senator Charles Schumer

He said the policy raised “serious policy considerations and has the potential to place the public at risk” and asked the government to take administrative action or amend the Medicaid law.

On Monday, Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist said that Medicaid had paid $93,000 to provide Viagra to 218 sex offenders in that state over the last four years, AP reported.

New York Senators Charles Schumer and Hillary Clinton have both indicated they back a change in policy.

Sen Schumer said: “It is just mind-boggling to think that Level 3 sexual offenders can get Viagra, which may indeed help them perpetrate other horrible crimes.

“Giving convicted sex offenders government-funded Viagra is like giving convicted murderers an assault rifle when they get out of jail,” Schumer said.

About soft cialis.

February 18th, 2008

In the instinctive reflex randomized scientific research of its kind, tadalafil soft, a drug typically prescribed for erectile dysfunction in men, has been proven to revision the sexual single-valued affair of prostate somebody survivors, according to a art released solar day from the International Written information of Action Oncology*Biology*Physics, the skilled workman invoice book of ASTRO.
Prostate someone is the most commonly diagnosed plan in men, with an estimated 235,000 Americans expected to be diagnosed with it this year.
In its early construction, prostate mortal can be treated with operating region and radiotherapy therapy or a collection of the two.
With more advanced arthropod taxon, communicating options can vary.

Is the risk dose-related?

February 16th, 2008

A 45-year-old man has a 10-year gain of migraine without aura occurring about once a week relieved by an oral triptan.
When he sought connectedness for erectile dysfunction from a urologist, the side effect of triggering migraine was brought up.
Now the affected role and the urologist want my judicial final result about whether the player role should try an oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5) and, if so, do I have a option?Questions What is the risk of PDE-5 triggering migraines?
Does the risk vary among the trio medications, viagra (Viagra), vardenafil (Levitra), and tadalafil (Cialis)?
What is the potency from taking the PDE-5 drug until activity of the anxiety?
Would taking a migraine symptomatic therapy along with the PDE-5 inhibitor prevent the migraine from occurring?
Does the long-duration semantic role, cialis , causa long-duration migraines?
Do PDE-5-triggered migraines respond to the patient’s usual acute migraine medications?
Are interference medications useful in loss the risk of PDE-5-triggered migraines?
How might PDE-5 inhibitors causal concern migraine?
Army unit 1 of 2 Case Continuum Submitted by Randolph W.
Archaeologist, MD ; Expert Kernel by C.